Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper revisits the influential “Leviathan” hypothesis, which posits that tax competition limits the growth of government spending in decentralized countries. It uses panel data to examine the effect of fiscal decentralization over time within countries, attempting to distinguish between decentralization that is funded by intergovernmental transfers and local taxation. First, it sets out a logic whereby decentralization should restrict government spending if state and local governments have wide-ranging authority to set the tax base and rate, especially on mobile assets. In countries where this is most clearly the case, decentralization retards the growth of government. Second, consistent with theoretical arguments drawn from welfare economics and positive political economy, it shows that governments grow faster as they fund a greater portion of public expenditures through intergovernmental transfers. Jonathan Rodden Assistant Professor Department of Political Science MIT E53-433 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-253-6261 Fax: 617-258-6164 E-mail: [email protected] Internet : http://web.mit.edu/jrodden/www
منابع مشابه
James Buchanan’s Theory of Federalism: From Fiscal Equity to the Ideal Political Order
The distinct characteristic in James Buchanan’s thinking about federalism in contrast to the traditional theory of fiscal federalism is his view about fiscal competition. In this paper, it is demonstrated that this thinking went through three stages. From the 1950s to the beginning of the 1970s, his analyses were well embedded in the traditional fiscal federalism literature and concerned with e...
متن کاملFiscal Decentralization in China and India: Competitive, Cooperative or Market Preserving Federalism?
This paper provides a comparative assessment of fiscal decentralization in China and India, including the standard components of expenditure and revenue assignments and institutions for intergovernmental transfers, as well as the nature of sub-national authorities over general economic activity. In particular, the case of China, where town and village enterprises have been very active, is contr...
متن کاملLeviathan and Legislative Monopoly Power: Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries
In this paper we test the Leviathan hypothesis, focusing on the joint impact of fiscal decentralization and legislative monopoly power in the growth of the public sector. Two proxies of legislative monopoly power are considered: the control of all relevant houses by the executive party and the margin of majority. Using a dynamic panel-based error correction model on OECD member countries, we fi...
متن کاملFiscal Decentralization in China and India:
This paper provides a comparative assessment of fiscal decentralization in China and India, including the standard components of expenditure and revenue assignments and institutions for intergovernmental transfers, as well as the nature of subnational authorities over general economic activity. In particular, the case of China, where town and village enterprises have been very active, is contra...
متن کاملThe Tax and Petroleum Revenue Effect on Iran’s Public Expenditures (1994–2015), Employing Fiscal Illusion Approach
I ncreased expenditures and the government size is an important issue in public sector economics. In this regard, various theories have been developed in order to justify the reasons for the public expenditure growth, and the theories have been empirically tested. One of the outlooks explaining the government expenditures growth and the economy size, is fiscal illusion approach. According ...
متن کامل